I will be running a Creative Drawing Workshop on Tuesday 18th August in East Grinstead. It's for two hours, so I'm not sure yet what I'll be able to fit in, but it's going to be more than just comics - drawing from the imagination for comics, games, stories, storyboards ... you name it.

There are still a handful of places left (not many!) and you can book here if interested.

At the end of last year I finally made the decision to ditch Adobe Photoshop. My disgruntlement started with a very large Brexit-related price-rise, from £9.98 to £14.99 per month. Then I felt more and more uncomfortable as AI features crept in, almost weekly it seemed. Then another price rise was announced - up to £19.97, a second big jump within less than two years.

A little earlier, in October 2025, Affinity/Canva released their new, and free, combined design/publisher/photo app, replacing the three individual Affinity apps (which I had bought at version 1 in 2015). I also owned ClipStudio Paint (I originally bought Manga Studio EX 4 in 2009, updating it eventually to ClipStudio) and used it very occasionally, mostly for their perspective rulers, severely lacking in Photoshop since I had largely moved to digital in 2016.

I'd been a Photoshop user since version 3, circa 1997 (version 4 was out by then but I bought a second-hand copy to begin with), and worked my way through at least a couple of huge manual-guides, becoming - if I do say so myself - quite proficient in it. For the next 28 years Photoshop was my right arm - I used it every day in a multitude of ways, it became a natural environment I hardly had to think about.

To leave that behind has been painful - more than I thought actually. Ending my Photoshop subscription caused them to offer me a couple of free months, so I kept it on as I tried to familiarise myself with a new work flow. I thought it would be relatively easy, but - as similar as Affinity is - it's different enough to get frustrating very quickly, especially when you're so familiar with the alternative. I haven't quite taken to it.

Photoshop disappeared from my hard drive for good in April of this year and I've struggled to slot into a new work-flow. Now, July, I think I'm just about there. ClipStudio has become my drawing app - actually it has a lot more going for it as a drawing app than Photoshop did, not surprising really as it was originally created specifically as comics creation software, and remains that today.

I'm not a fan of many of its short-cut manga tools and don't use them - but I'm beginning to get used to the interface at last. My process remains essentially the same as when I drew on paper, just now it's on a glass screen instead.

ClipStudio's lettering tools don't work well for me - I have a style for that already in place and can't replicate it in CS. So that's when I move over to Affinity, where the master page is assembled and I layout the balloons and lettering in its Vector Studio.

So far this year has not been productive for The Brambletye Box - it has partly been this work flow upheaval, but my schedule has also been kept off-track through some work (much-needed), some family health issues, and, yeah, some creative struggles here and there due to all of the above. But you can't regret what's been, so I'll move forward, refine the workflow more as I go, and carry on - I'm still as excited about this new Julius Chancer story as ever.

Just getting in a brief final post of 2025. It's not been my most productive year - a lot of personal stuff going on, health family, work, both good and not so good, but we're still here!

More progress was made on The Brambletye Box, though not nearly as much as it should have been. However, it was just not possible under the circumstances - I intend for 2026 to be way better on that front.

Work was difficult, especially as AI 'images' continue to stamp all over human creativity and spread itself to every corner, polluting the internet. Work did pick up a little more towards the end of the year, but my career definitely needs a rethink in the face of these new challenges. I have some ideas, we'll see where they lead.

The world is really taking a hammering at the moment, but we can keep doing what we love, creating, taking control of the things we can control and not letting the things we can't dictate our outlook. Acts of art, acts of kindness - the small things matter.

I wish you all a successful, healthy and happy 2026.

A couple of days ago someone alerted me to a book called The Clear Line in Comics and Cinema, a Transmedial Approach, written by David Pinho Barros. They did this because it had a small section looking at The Rainbow Orchid.

I have to say that these days I do not go looking for reviews of my work - positive or negative. Positive ones make me squirm and feel unworthy, and negative ones make me feel bad - neither is enjoyable (though I am very grateful for the positive ones).

The book looks really interesting, despite the fact I'm a little wary of the overanalysing of an author's works. But the intersection of clear line comics, a highly narrative form of storytelling, and parallel philosophies in film is quite fascinating (and one of the directors Barros looks at is Yasujiro Ozu, a favourite of mine).

cover for The Clear Line in Comics and Cinema, art by Joost Swarte

I am jumping the gun, I have not read it yet, though I do intend to. But I did screw up my courage and skim-read the section on The Rainbow Orchid, and here I saw a statement that I want to address as I do feel it misrepresents my motivations.

Firstly I should say I'm a great believer in the idea that once you've finished a work and it goes out into the world, it is no longer your possession. It belongs to whoever picks it up and reads it, and they can bring all their thoughts, beliefs, prejudices, biases and feelings to that work and interpret it however they want. They may not align with the author's, and they may read things into the story the author never intended or meant, and that has to be the way it is.

In chapter 3, 'The clear line after Tintin et les Picaros', Barros says: "I propose to look at two [authors] in particular: the French Olivier Marin and the British Garen Ewing. In both cases, their use of the clear line is mostly a consequence of a selling strategy, which, by proclaiming a graphic affiliation with the classic series, aims at attracting the nostalgic reader and, simultaneously, surprising him or her with contemporary representations of topics which were proscribed in the youth magazines of the likes of Tintin, such as highly eroticised renderings of the female body."

That last bit about the "female body" refers to Olivier's work more than mine, but I'm a little perturbed that isn't clear, especially as I made the decision not to sexualise any aspect of the characters or story in that book. And that idea is connected to the main point - that The Rainbow Orchid uses the clear line style as a 'selling strategy'.

This could not be further from the reality of the comic's origins. Back in the 1990s I was looking more seriously at working in comics. I had done a lot of fanzine work and felt my art was improving so I was getting a portfolio together and going to comics shows and meeting professional artists and editors.

Thanks to this I went through a process of realisation - I didn't think I actually wanted to get into professional comics after all. While I had enjoyed working with various writers, I knew the main thing I liked doing was creating and writing stories, and being the illustrator for someone else's vision did not fulfil that aspiration. And this wasn't a reaction to a lack of success, in fact it came about when I started to have some succes - having work accepted for Heartbreak Hotel, doing a full US superhero comic for Blue Comet Press, and particularly after having an enthusiastic response at a convention with a DC editor and an invitation to contact them for work on a new black and white imprint they were starting.

I never followed up on that last one because I was coming to the realisation that this was not what I wanted. I found drawing hard, I wasn't naturally talented and I wasn't fast (essential for comics) - but I did enjoy it, and I really loved the comics medium. After some soul-searching I decided to concentrate on a career as an illustrator and leave the comics as a spare-time pursuit, something I could just enjoy for my own gratification.

Mr Tardy, Mr Tardy and Mr Tardy, The Brambletye Box by Garen Ewing

What did I enjoy? Big fat escapist adventure stories! Also I wanted an antidote to all the gritty 'adult' comics that were everywhere at the time. My art was naturally cleaning up, particularly after adapting The Tempest I was appreciating simplicity, reduction and clarity. I'd had my first paying job, for a newspaper, and was able to complete my collection of Tintin books - the staple (along with Asterix) of my comic-reading childhood. More importantly I had just discovered Blake and Mortimer, and had bought my first Jacques Tardi book.

So, I'd decided. I would not work towards a career in mainstream comics but instead concentrate on working as a commercial illustrator, the comics would be purely for my own enjoyment, self-published for whatever small readership would gather in front of me.

Things changed when the internet arrived. I got on it in about 1998 and started putting The Rainbow Orchid up as part of my website in about 2005. Without much publicity (I was still treating it as a hobby) it started to gain traction anyway and largely thanks to some much larger web-comics coming across it and linking to it, the readership escalated.

It's another story, but this kind of exposure lead to an agent and eventual mainstream book publication and, of course, vast wealth (yeah, joking on that last one). I chased none of these things, they came to me, though I was very happy about it, of course.

That's an overly-long ramble to the statement that my use of the clear-line is the "consequence of a selling strategy". I do resent that idea, and it's explicitly because that makes it seem like the decision was rather a calculating scheme to elicit sales in the marketplace - the opposite of what actually happened.

I don't want to have a go at David Pinho Barros for his remark. Although I have talked about the origin of The Rainbow Orchid I can't expect him to seek out everything I've ever said. He does quote the following I wrote for my website many years ago (still there in my faq) ...

"I wanted to invoke the atmosphere I loved from European adventure albums such as Hergé's Tintin, Edgar P. Jacobs' Blake & Mortimer, Yves Chaland's Freddy Lombard, and Tardi's Adèle Blanc-Sec, to name just a few. Most British readers cite Tintin because not many other ligne claire comics have made it over from France and Belgium, but it is an entire school of comic strip storytelling with many creators working in the style, just like manga often has a certain look to it. The Rainbow Orchid has been compared stylistically to Floc'h's Trilogie Anglaise or Jacobs' La Marque Jaune. The better you know Tintin, the more apparent the differences, but I don't refute the similarities - it was a conscious decision."

... and I can certainly see how a 'conscious decision' to invoke the style of Hergé and Jacobs might be seen as a commercial choice, though actually it was merely one born out of enthusiasm for exploring the form for myself. I guess that's the bit missing - I wanted to invoke that atmosphere for myself.

Art by Exem for the Cartoonmuseum Basel

There's nothing wrong with making an artistic decision in order to maximise revenue, but it does have the feeling of an accusation, and offers the idea that money, not art, is the driving force, something that is generally frowned upon. And not that I'm against making monery off my art - far from it - and I strongly dislike the conceit that 'true art' can only go hand-in-hand with poverty.

Since having the book out, and even being lucky enough to have it appear translated in the Franco-Belgian world that inspired it, I have seen the more commercial side of the ligne claire. It certainly has an aspect of marketability in Europe. In the UK my largest audience was children (although not explicitly a children's book), whereas in France, the Netherlands and Germany, the largest audience I saw was people like myself, older, mostly male, and nostalgist collectors (not exclusively, and also not a problem by any means!).

This is partially due to the publishers, smaller, boutique publishers who cater to that audience with reprints and classic series. With a much bigger publisher in the UK (Egmont) the readership was hugely varied, children, teens, adults, quite strong in both male and female readership.

I actually suspect the style I've chosen to work in has been a hindrance in my own country, as so many people are familiar with Tintin, and nothing else, that I can appear merely as a copycat or fan-artist. While I was making Orchid I purposefully didn't look at a Tintin book - for years - wanting to develop my own ligne claire style. Of course it's always going to be compared to Tintin, and fair enough.

Now I have returned to the point I was at twenty years ago - a new Julius Chancer book and I'm doing it for myself. I haven't signed with a publisher and don't strongly mind whether I do or not - it would be preferable, of course, but I'm happily prepared to self-publish. I'm more aware of the 'clear-line scene' now, and certainly I've changed since The Rainbow Orchid, the comics scene has vastly changed, so my comics have changed.

Anyway, that answers the point I wanted to address about my book's motivations! Whether it's a wise thing to do I'm not certain, but, especially as I get older, I see my creativity as part of my identity, and feel the record should be corrected, even if just here on my blog.

I hope I haven't misinterpreted Barros's writing, and I do look forward to reading his book, which looks fascinating. I'm enormously flattered he even chose The Rainbow Orchid for inclusion, it's a privilege to be part of it whether praise or criticism. You can download the book yourself from here.

Here's a little video I made for the weekend showing some of the art for The Brambletye Box from roughs to pencils and then to the finished, coloured art.

I'm going to be running a comics workshop at the Forest Row Festival on Saturday 14th June, from 10 until 12 noon.

Recommended for ages 7+ and teens (or anyone, really!), you can book through the festival website here.

And have a look at the little video for it here.

In The Rainbow Orchid Julius Chancer's car was a red Mercedes SSK. The reason this became his car is because I was visiting family in Reading in the late 90s, when I started the strip, and saw a toy model of the car in a department store and thought it would do as reference. Cars are difficult to draw, and if you have to draw the same vehicle from different angles a model can really help.

The first appearance of Julius's SSK in 'Orchid' and the Lorraine Dietrich in 'Samurai'

In The Secret of the Samurai, which is set a couple of years earlier (when the SSK had not yet been built), Julius drove a blue Lorraine Dietrich (for which I also used a toy model for reference). But for The Brambletye Box, Jules is back with his red Mercedes.

The SSK followed by a Hispano-Suiza in The Brambletye Box

These days there is way more reference available online (I even visited an actual SSK at Beaulieu a couple of years ago), so I've been able to be a little more accurate with some of the car's details. I'm not going overboard - I don't need the drawings to take any longer than they already do. As I've improved I don't need a model for every car - Lily's gold Bentley 3-Litre is drawn with just a sheet of photo reference at hand.

Lily's gold Bentley 3-Litre

An editor once asked me what I found most difficult to draw - my answer was "cars". A month or so later I submitted the first chapter of my comic for him and there, on page one, panel one, was a big white Bentley Continental. "I thought you wanted to avoid drawing cars?", he asked. But that's kind of why I put it in there. I have this little bee in my head that says "you can draw anything", and when I know something will be difficult I find myself writing it in, almost as a challenge.

A Bentley Continental from 'Charlie Jefferson and the Tomb of Nazaleod' for The DFC

This is something that so-called 'A.I. artists' will never understand, and A.I. can never reproduce. It is not just the finished result, it is the process, the choices, the mistakes, the challenge, the struggle, the effort, the evolution - the human being - that makes the finished art. (And, still on A.I., beware the amount of A.I.-rendered cars now online - they're not accurate!)

That Bentley was more modern, and I do find them particularly hard, all curves and streamlined. 1920's cars are a little more boxy - but also more beautiful in my eyes. The SSK is a work of art.

The Mercedes SSK at Beaulieu, once owned by Sir Peter Ustinov

Only recently I discovered the SSK featured as another comic character's car of choice - or in his animated version anyway (I'm not sure about the original manga) - Lupin III drives, and regularly crashes, a yellow Mercedes SSK. This has been eclipsed somewhat by the Fiat 500 he drives in his most famous outing, Miyazaki's Castle of Cagliostro.

Lupin in his yellow SSK

I'm very happy to have that link, in a similar way to when I chose the Breguet 280T as the aircraft that takes Jules and co. to India in The Rainbow Orchid, only to discover, on a later visit to Angouleme, that this uncommon aircraft had also been featured in pioneer French comic character Bécassine's adventures (Bécassine en Aeroplane, 1930).

Bécassine with a 280T, and Nathaniel Crumpole with a 280T

Anyway, in line with this bee in my head to challenge myself, I've crazily written a car chase into The Brambletye Box (a Hispano-Suiza H6 chasing the SSK down the A22), and that's what I'm drawing at the moment. It's enjoyable - but definitely another challenge!

I have updated the Julius Chancer characters guide to include those from The Brambletye Box. It's not all of them yet - just those appearing where I'm up to at the moment.

Now there's quite a few characters on that page (from The Brambletye Box, The Rainbow Orchid and The Secret of the Samurai) I have rewritten it so you can show and hide the various character sets from the stories - let me know if it's not working!

A task that's been on my to-do list for about 5 years now has at last been ticked off - an update and redesign of my Logos For Shows website.

Logos For Shows is my little side-business of providing theatre art for schools, amateur companies and professionals to use for their show publicity. It started back in 2011 out as a reaction to seeing my Oliver! logo being stolen and used all over the place (sadly that still happens) and a chance to license my artwork and make it affordable for those on a budget.

The next thing to do is to increase the number of shows I have available. I already have a second Grease design and some Peter Pan artwork at the sketch stage, and plans for quite a few more to come - it's just a matter of making the time for it!

The Secret of the Samurai English edition has sold out. BD Must gave me three batches of forty books in all - the first batch, almost exactly a year ago, sold out in three days or so, the second in a couple of months, and third more slowly over the past 7 or 8 months.

Actually I do have one copy left, and my plan is to do a nice drawing in it (rather than just a quick sketch) and put it on ebay in the near future as a little fund-raiser. Watch this space.